Gödel's

Gödel's

Share this post

Gödel's
Gödel's
The Paradox of the Court
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

The Paradox of the Court

Stimulating critical thinking - a loose series on paradoxes

Alexander Rink's avatar
Alexander Rink
Feb 09, 2024
2

Share this post

Gödel's
Gödel's
The Paradox of the Court
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Gödel's is a newsletter about interweaving ideas and making decisions under uncertain conditions. I discuss knowledge management, mental models, and supporting Tools for Thought.


Illustrate the paradox of the court in a Japanese ink drawing style, using brown and red ink. The scene should depict an ancient Greek courtroom setting, with Protagoras and Euathlus standing before a judge, each presenting their argument. Protagoras, with a confident posture, gestures towards Euathlus, who appears contemplative and ready to rebut. The courtroom is adorned with simple, elegant lines that suggest the architecture of the period, and the characters are dressed in traditional Greek attire. The use of brown ink should capture the seriousness of the courtroom and the debate, while red ink highlights the tension and the paradoxical nature of the dispute between the teacher and the student.

The paradox of the court, often referred to as Protagoras's paradox, presents a fascinating conundrum that intertwines the realms of logic, ethics, and legal theory. This paradox arises from a lawsuit between the ancient Greek philosopher Protagoras and his student Euathlus. Protagoras, known for his contributions to sophistry and rhetoric, agreed to teach Euathlus the art of rhetoric on the condition that Euathlus would pay him after winning his first court case. Euathlus, eager to learn but cautious about the commitment, accepted the terms.

However, after completing his studies, Euathlus refrained from practicing law and thus did not win any cases. In response, Protagoras sued Euathlus for the fees, creating a paradox. Protagoras argued that if he won the case, he would be paid his fee per the court's decision. Conversely, if Euathlus won, according to the original agreement, he would still need to pay Protagoras since he would have won his first court case. From Protagoras's perspective, regardless of the case's outcome, he should rightfully be paid.

Euathlus, on the other hand, presented a counterargument. He posited that if he lost the case, per the original agreement, he would not have to pay Protagoras since he would not have won his first case. Similarly, if he won the case, the court's decision would override the agreement, absolving him of the need to pay. Therefore, from Euathlus's standpoint, regardless of the outcome, he should not be required to pay Protagoras.

Both arguments seem logically sound, yet they lead to contradictory conclusions.


More paradoxes?


Subscribe to Gödel's

By Alexander Rink · Launched 3 years ago
Aiming for completeness and consistency is honorable but futile - Gödel’s is a newsletter about interweaving ideas and making decisions under uncertain conditions. I talk about knowledge management, mental models, and supporting Tools for Thought.
Yuvraj Singh Chouhan's avatar
Tyler Corderman's avatar
2 Likes
2

Share this post

Gödel's
Gödel's
The Paradox of the Court
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TfT Performance: Obsidian
Obsidian is the first non-outliner in this benchmark and is based on Markdown files stored in local folders. The benchmark results are astonishing.
Jan 11, 2022 • 
Alexander Rink
10

Share this post

Gödel's
Gödel's
TfT Performance: Obsidian
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
10
TfT Performance: Interim Results
We now had five opponents in the competition: Roam Research, Obsidian, Logseq, Craft, and RemNote. Time for a first interim result; who is ahead and who…
Jan 23, 2022 • 
Alexander Rink
8

Share this post

Gödel's
Gödel's
TfT Performance: Interim Results
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
7
TfT Performance: Logseq
Open Source, mobile client, extensible, rapid development, that's Logseq. But can it stand up to the demands of my field test and how does it compare to…
Jan 7, 2022 • 
Alexander Rink
11

Share this post

Gödel's
Gödel's
TfT Performance: Logseq
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4

Ready for more?

© 2025 Alexander Rink
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.