Gödel's

Gödel's

Share this post

Gödel's
Gödel's
TfT Performance: Interim Results

TfT Performance: Interim Results

We now had five opponents in the competition: Roam Research, Obsidian, Logseq, Craft, and RemNote. Time for a first interim result; who is ahead and who still has to catch up?

Alexander Rink's avatar
Alexander Rink
Jan 23, 2022
∙ Paid
9

Share this post

Gödel's
Gödel's
TfT Performance: Interim Results
7
1
Share

If you are new here, you may want to read about the methodology behind this benchmark, look into the machine room and visit the results of Roam Research, Logseq, Obsidian, RemNote, and Craft.

Side note

I took all results from the in-depth benchmarks done before. If I had more than one result for the same action (e.g., app starting time or opening backlinks), I calculated the average of all tries.

All diagrams are sorted with the fastest application on top and the slowest at the bottom.

And please remember: We focus here exclusively on the performance figures of some operations. These may be entirely irrelevant for your use case. Also, the numbers say nothing about the tool's other capabilities - so please take the results with a grain of salt.

Importing

Times for importing files aren’t critical because you won't do this daily. But waiting almost half an hour for the slowest application while the fastest can process the same amount in just 18 seconds is a huge difference and can be annoying.

…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Gödel's to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Alexander Rink
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share