The ELI5 Method
Why Simple Communication Wins Every Time
Why Do Smart People Struggle to Explain Simple Things?
Picture this: A brilliant engineer presents their groundbreaking solution to the executive team. Twenty minutes in, glazed eyes stare back from around the conference table. Despite having the perfect answer, they've lost their audience in technical jargon and complex explanations.
This scenario repeats daily across organizations worldwide. Subject matter experts—engineers, analysts, researchers, consultants—possess deep knowledge that could transform businesses but struggle to communicate their insights effectively. Their expertise becomes a communication barrier rather than an advantage.
The fundamental challenge isn't lack of knowledge—it's the curse of knowledge. Once you understand something deeply, it becomes nearly impossible to remember what it was like not to know it. Research shows that different personality types process and communicate information differently, and experts often default to their natural technical communication style regardless of their audience's needs.
Why Does Complex Communication Fail So Often?
Why do detailed, comprehensive explanations leave audiences confused rather than enlightened?
The answer lies in how human brains process information. When you simultaneously overwhelm someone with complex details, technical terminology, and multi-layered concepts, their cognitive capacity is exceeded. Instead of understanding more, they understand less—or nothing at all.
Several factors compound this communication breakdown:
Cognitive Overload: The human brain can only hold 7±2 pieces of information in working memory. When experts dump 15 concepts in five minutes, audiences cannot process everything.
Assumption Gaps: Experts assume background knowledge that audiences don't possess. They skip foundational concepts that seem "obvious" but are actually crucial for understanding.
Jargon Barriers: Technical vocabulary that feels natural to experts creates foreign language barriers for general audiences.
Abstract Thinking Demands: Complex explanations often require abstract thinking skills that audiences may not have developed in that domain.
Attention Span Limitations: Research indicates that effective communicators are intentional about what they say, why they say it, how they say it, when they say it, who they say it to, and where. Most complex explanations fail because they ignore attention span realities.
Why Do People Learn Better from Simple Explanations?
Why does simplification actually improve understanding rather than dumbing things down?
The counterintuitive truth is that simplification reveals deep understanding rather than superficial knowledge. When you can explain something simply, it demonstrates that you truly comprehend the underlying principles, relationships, and essential elements.
Simplification works because it aligns with natural learning processes:
Pattern Recognition: Simple explanations help people identify familiar patterns and connect new information to existing knowledge frameworks.
Chunking Strategy: Breaking complex topics into digestible pieces allows the brain to process each component thoroughly before moving to the next level.
Analogical Reasoning: Simple explanations often use analogies that leverage existing understanding to explain new concepts.
Active Processing: When information is presented simply, audiences can actively engage with concepts rather than passively trying to survive information overload.
Memory Consolidation: Simple frameworks create memorable structures that support long-term retention and application.
Why Does the ELI5 Method Work So Effectively?
Why does explaining concepts "as if to a five-year-old" create better professional communication than traditional expert-to-expert approaches?
The ELI5 method forces communicators to identify and articulate the essential core of any complex topic. When explaining something to a five-year-old, you cannot rely on jargon, assumptions, or technical shortcuts. You must find the fundamental principles that make the concept work.
This constraint produces several communication advantages:
Forced Clarity: ELI5 eliminates ambiguous language and vague concepts that confuse audiences.
Universal Accessibility: Simple explanations work for novices and experts, making communication more inclusive.
Memorable Frameworks: ELI5 explanations create mental models that stick with audiences long after presentations.
Confidence Building: When people understand your explanation completely, they feel confident engaging with your ideas and asking relevant questions.
Decision Enablement: Simple explanations help decision-makers quickly grasp implications and evaluate options without getting lost in technical details.
The method works because it respects fundamental cognitive realities rather than fighting against them.
Why Don't More Professionals Use Simple Communication?
Why do smart people use complex communication approaches when simple ones work better?
Several psychological and professional factors create resistance to simplification:
Expertise Display: Many professionals believe complex communication demonstrates superior knowledge and competence. They worry that simple explanations might make them appear less intelligent or knowledgeable.
Imposter Syndrome: Some experts use complexity as a defensive shield. The expert can attribute confusion to audience limitations rather than explanation quality if the audience doesn't understand.
Professional Culture: Different communication styles reflect different ways people express themselves. In many technical fields, complex communication becomes a cultural norm that signals membership in expert communities.
Time Pressure: Developing simple explanations requires more preparation than dumping technical knowledge. Many professionals choose quick, complex explanations over thoughtful, simple ones.
Lack of Training: Most technical education focuses on building domain expertise rather than communication skills. Professionals excel in their fields but never learn how to translate knowledge for different audiences.
Fear of Oversimplification: Experts worry that simple explanations might omit important nuances or create misunderstandings.
However, the most successful professionals recognize that learning to be flexible about their preferred communication style allows others to hear the important things they need to communicate more successfully.
When NOT to Use the ELI5 Method
While ELI5 proves powerful in many contexts, it's not universally appropriate. Understanding when to avoid this method is crucial for communication effectiveness.
Expert-to-Expert Technical Communication
When communicating with experts who need technical depth and precision, ELI5 can hinder rather than help. Medical professionals discussing surgical procedures, engineers reviewing system specifications, or researchers presenting detailed methodologies require technical vocabulary and complex frameworks to communicate accurately.
In these contexts, oversimplification can:
Omit critical technical details that experts need for implementation
Create misunderstandings when precision matters more than accessibility
Waste time explaining concepts that audiences already understand
Reduce credibility by appearing to underestimate audience expertise
High-Stakes Safety and Compliance Contexts
When accuracy and precision could impact safety, legal compliance, or financial outcomes, ELI5's simplification approach becomes inappropriate. Legal contracts, safety protocols, regulatory procedures, and technical specifications require precise language that cannot be simplified without losing essential meaning.
The risks include:
Legal liability from oversimplified instructions that lead to errors
Safety hazards when critical details get lost in analogies
Regulatory violations occur when compliance requirements aren't fully communicated
Financial losses from misunderstood contractual obligations
Cultural and Professional Hierarchy Considerations
Some professional and cultural contexts expect sophisticated communication to show respect and competence. Different personalities mean different communication styles; nowhere is this more apparent than in the workplace.
ELI5 may be inappropriate when:
Academic audiences expect scholarly discourse and theoretical frameworks
Senior executives might interpret simple explanations as condescending
Cultural contexts that value formal, complex communication styles
Professional credentialing situations where demonstrating expertise matters more than accessibility
Time-Critical Emergency Situations
When immediate action is required, the time needed to develop good ELI5 explanations becomes a liability. Emergencies, crisis communications, and urgent decision-making contexts often require direct, technical communication, even if it's less accessible.
Consider these scenarios:
Medical emergencies where technical terms convey precise information quickly
System failures requiring immediate technical troubleshooting
Crisis management where speed matters more than universal understanding
Time-sensitive decisions where a comprehensive explanation delays critical action
When Complexity IS the Message
Sometimes, audiences need to understand the complexity itself. When your goal is to demonstrate the sophisticated nature of a problem, the intricate relationships between variables, or the advanced capabilities required for a solution, simplification can undermine your message.
Examples include:
Research grant proposals that must demonstrate methodological sophistication
Technical product demonstrations showcase the complex capabilities of the product
Strategic planning discussions that require understanding system interdependencies
Change management communications where people need to appreciate the transition complexity
Building Expert Credibility
Appropriate use of technical language and complex frameworks signals competence and membership when establishing credibility within expert communities. Personality theory greatly influences an individual's preferred communication style, and some audiences interpret overly simple communication as evidence of shallow understanding.
This applies in:
Professional conferences where peers expect sophisticated discourse
Academic publishing where complexity demonstrates rigor
Consulting presentations where technical depth justifies fees
Industry leadership contexts where thought leadership requires advanced thinking
Strategic Communication Choice
The key insight is that communication methods should serve a purpose. Effective communicators customize their messages based on what they know about the listener. ELI5 represents one powerful tool in a comprehensive communication toolkit, not a universal solution.
Successful professionals develop judgment about when simplicity serves their objectives and when complexity becomes necessary. This requires understanding your audience, context, goals, and the specific demands of each communication situation.
The ELI5 Implementation Framework
Understanding why ELI5 works enables systematic application across professional contexts:
Start with the Core: Identify the most crucial concept your audience needs to understand. Everything else builds from this foundation.
Use Familiar Analogies: Connect new concepts to experiences your audience already understands. Effective communicators customize their messages based on what they know about the listener.
Eliminate Jargon: Replace technical terms with everyday language whenever possible. When technical terms are necessary, define them immediately using simple language.
Build Progressively: Start with basic concepts and add complexity gradually. Each layer should build naturally on the previous foundation.
Test Understanding: Regularly check that your audience follows your explanation before adding new concepts.
Embrace Repetition: Repeat key concepts using different words and examples to reinforce understanding.
Practical Example: Cloud Computing Explanation
Complex Version: "Cloud computing leverages distributed infrastructure to provide scalable, on-demand resource provisioning through virtualized service abstractions."
ELI5 Version: "Imagine if instead of buying a car, you could call whenever you needed transportation. Someone would immediately bring you exactly the right vehicle—a truck for moving, a sports car for fun, a van for family trips. You only pay for what you use and never worry about maintenance, storage, or upgrades. Cloud computing works the same way, but companies call for computer power instead of vehicles whenever they need it."
The ELI5 version immediately clarifies the value proposition, eliminates technical barriers, and provides a memorable framework for understanding.
Mastering Simple Communication
The ELI5 method represents more than a communication technique—it's a mindset that prioritizes audience understanding over speaker convenience. By consistently asking "How would I explain this to someone who knows nothing about this topic?" you develop communication skills that serve you across every professional context.
The irony is profound: the simpler your explanations, the smarter you appear to your audiences. People remember and recommend professionals who can make complex things feel manageable rather than those who make simple things feel impossible.
Success with ELI5 requires practice, patience, and genuine respect for your audience's time and cognitive capacity. The investment pays extraordinary dividends in clearer thinking, stronger relationships, and more influential professional communication.
Did you notice how this article progressively asked "Why?" at each level to dig deeper into the ELI5 method? Starting with why smart people struggle to explain things, then why complex communication fails, why simple explanations work better, why ELI5 is effective, and finally why people resist simplification, each question revealed a deeper layer of understanding. This follows the 5Why method, a systematic questioning technique that uncovers root causes and fundamental principles by asking "Why?" repeatedly until you reach core insights. In our next article, I'll show you how to apply the 5Why method to transform your problem-solving presentations, strategic analyses, and diagnostic communications into methodical, thorough investigations that reveal actionable solutions.


